profile | register | search
|
|
profile | register | search |
| Forums | Chukas Akum | Sheitels | Post Reply | Send Topic To a Friend |
| Author | Topic |
| MODERATOR | Posted - 15 July 2004 14:24
jake, I took the liberty of omitting your piskei halachah and pontification. I will answer your question, which is what this siute is for. The Rav in quesiton is not merely saying "I cannot find a heter for all possible cases that you, as an ignoramus, may mistakenly apply my heter for." He is saying, besides that, that "I see no heter for the specific case that you asked about." And that is nothing but a plain lie. Nowhere does it say the Rav has to change his language to make his psak into a Milsa D'Misparshe Bsheni Anpin or some ambiguous language so as not to lie. He is allowed to say that there is no heter for the specific case asked, even though there is. And the difference between changing a Halachah and changing the situation is clear and needs no lengthy explanation: It doesnt say anywhere that "paskening" wrong is yehoreg val yaavor - it says chainging what the Torah says, is. So if lets say I know you are going to use your milchig pot to cook your meatballs, because you dont care about the laws of basar b'cholov. I would be allowed to stop you from doing so by saying that the pot was used to cook pork, but I would not be allowed to say for instance that theres a halachah lmoshe misinai that copper pots are prohibited to use. In the second case, I am making ua new halachah; in the first case I am not. |
| benzee | Posted - 21 July 2004 13:36
what happened to page 16? |
| MODERATOR | Posted - 29 July 2004 17:13
This IS page 16 |
| Punims | Posted - 30 July 2004 13:47
You're on it buddy. |
| HZ | Posted - 30 July 2004 16:56
He probably didn't see it do to the indent, and posted from page 15. |
| shabbos | Posted - 18 August 2004 16:47
I have heard that all Sheitels are now OK from my Rov and everybody! is supposes to know. Why has frumteens been so slow on this. |
| MODERATOR | Posted - 18 August 2004 19:13
I dont understand. I always said they were all muttar. |
| shabbos | Posted - 29 August 2004 12:34
Yes, but not for the reason given. The reason given for the heter is that it has been discovered that the hair (or at least enough of it) does not actually end up in Sheitels - not that there is no A'Z. |
| MODERATOR | Posted - 29 August 2004 12:37
If you mean to say that the "rove" shaitles are not made from temple hair, that is nothing new. It was (a) discussed above, (b) rejected by Rav Elyashev in his letter to Rabbi Belsky, and also when he spoke to Rav Feivel Cohen. This is nothing new - no new discovery and no new issue. Nothing has changed. |
| elana_katz | Posted - 09 January 2008 21:08
is it true that some women have their sheital made of their own hair? |
| MODERATOR | Posted - 19 May 2008 1:46
Yes. But what does this have to do with this forum please? |
| whatami | Posted - 19 May 2008 17:21
may be she thought this is for all discussing shaitels and the indin shaitel was just a off topic discusion if she did not read all pages? elana, please be checking next time thank you please forgave my english. |
Click Here To Close Thread, Administrators & Moderators Only.
Show All Forums |
Post Reply